In pursuance of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in IA No. 7-12 in Civil Appeal No. 5092 of 2009 made by Mr. Ravi kumar Meena and other three persons, a Special Counseling for Delhi ST category candidates who have appeared in CEE – 2009 and applied for admission in erstwhile DCE, NSIT and DTU,
Order Copy
| S. No. | Diary No. / Case No. [STATUS] | Petitioner Vs. Respondent Advocate | Listing Date Court No. | ||
| 1 |
| RAVI KUMAR MEENA & ORS. Vs. GOVT. OF NCT ORS. Advocate : NARESH KAUSHIK | Disposed on : 24/11/2009 | ||
| Page : 1 | |||||
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
24.11.2009
Present: Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv. for the petitioner in Item
Nos.23.
Mr. G.D. Goel and Mr. Praveen Kumar,
Advs. for respondent no.2 ? GNCTD in Item Nos.23 and 25.
Ms. Rinchen O. Bhutia, Adv. for respondent no.1 in Item
No.23.
Mr. Elgin Matt John, Adv. for Ms. Anju Bhattacharya,
Adv. for respondent no.1 in Item No.25.
WP(C).NO.11421/2009 and WP(C).NO.11627/2009.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that a clarification has been
rendered by the Supreme Court of India in the joint application moved by the
GNCTD of Delhi as well as the Delhi Technological University, by which the Delhi
ST category candidates who had appeared in CEE ? 2009 are to be considered for
Special Counselling.
In view of the clarification rendered by the Apex Court, Mr. G.D. Goel,
learned counsel for respondent no.2 ? Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University,
submits that respondent no.2 shall be bound by the Orders passed by the Supreme
Court of India, and the Delhi ST candidates shall be called for Special
Counselling.
Counsel further submit that in view of the orders passed by the Apex Court
nothing further survives in the present writ petitions and the same may be
disposed of.
Accordingly, present petitions as well as all pending applications are
disposed of in above terms.
G.S. SISTANI, J.
November 24, 2009
'msr'
27.
24.11.2009
Present: Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv. for the petitioner in Item
Nos.23.
Mr. G.D. Goel and Mr. Praveen Kumar,
Advs. for respondent no.2 ? GNCTD in Item Nos.23 and 25.
Ms. Rinchen O. Bhutia, Adv. for respondent no.1 in Item
No.23.
Mr. Elgin Matt John, Adv. for Ms. Anju Bhattacharya,
Adv. for respondent no.1 in Item No.25.
WP(C).NO.11421/2009 and WP(C).NO.11627/2009.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that a clarification has been
rendered by the Supreme Court of India in the joint application moved by the
GNCTD of Delhi as well as the Delhi Technological University, by which the Delhi
ST category candidates who had appeared in CEE ? 2009 are to be considered for
Special Counselling.
In view of the clarification rendered by the Apex Court, Mr. G.D. Goel,
learned counsel for respondent no.2 ? Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University,
submits that respondent no.2 shall be bound by the Orders passed by the Supreme
Court of India, and the Delhi ST candidates shall be called for Special
Counselling.
Counsel further submit that in view of the orders passed by the Apex Court
nothing further survives in the present writ petitions and the same may be
disposed of.
Accordingly, present petitions as well as all pending applications are
disposed of in above terms.
G.S. SISTANI, J.
November 24, 2009
'msr'
27.
A Special Counseling for Delhi ST category candidates who have appeared in CEE – 2009 and applied for admission in erstwhile DCE, NSIT and DTU, has been done
As per the direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court only those candidates who have not already taken admission in any institution or university in Delhi was considered for counseling.
List of admitted student in DCE/ NSIT/DTU
CLICK TO DOWN LODE ADMITTED STUDENT
MUKESH KUMAR
1 comments:
Congraz to all the students who made it after the said order...
Post a Comment